QUESTION: What is Heresy?

What is Heresy?

SHORT ANSWER:
The word, “heresy” itself, only appears in the King James translation one time in Acts 24:14.  It’s plural form, “heresies” occurs another three times in 1 Corinthians 11:19, Galatians 5:20, and 2 Peter 2:1.  All the other occurrences of this same Greek word (“hairesis”) are translated as “sect”.  (The NASB, another ‘formal translation’ follows the KJV closely, with only two verses translating the word as “factions” instead)(feel free to ask about the difference between formally equivalent and dynamically equivalent translations)
The Strong’s Concordance uses the following words in defining this greek word: “choice”, “a party”, “disunion”.  Finally, Merriam Webster defines this generically as, “dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice”.

Taking this all into account at a high level, “heresy” would be any deviation from an accepted doctrine.  Admittedly, this generic definition does not take into account human reality.  That reality, and real world application, is that people disagree and not all those disagreements need be called “heresy”, nor are they worth fighting about.  Your views, by mere definition of the term, may be heretical to me; however, mine could also heretical to you.  So who’s right?  And how do we decide?  Sadly, our sinful condition, and pride, cause a lot of disagreement where none actually need be.  We’ll deal with that more in the ‘Long Answer’.

Heresy then, would be any teaching and/or practice that deviates from a proper interpretation of the Bible.  This presumes of course the existence of absolute, objective, and transcendent truth, that has been communicated by our Creator to us, and is able to be understood.  This heresy could also come from within or without the Christian community.

LONG ANSWER:

Taking then from the definition we’re working from, let’s talk about this more in depth.  Heresy again, would be any teaching and/or practice that deviates from a proper interpretation of the Bible.

This then begs many questions.  Whose interpretation is correct?  Who is qualified to decide?  How much can we disagree?  Is every disagreement heresy?

Proper Interpretation, It’s Hard Work

The first thing we must say is that properly interpreting can be hard work.  To me, it is very annoying to hear someone say, “it’s clear in the Bible that”, or the classic, “it says what it says”.  Well, it DOES say what it says; however, many times those verses require work, minus hidden agendas, pride, and presumptions, to get to the proper interpretation.  I admit that some verses are easier to interpret; however, there are others that good people disagree on.  There are verses that Holy Spirit filled believers disagree on.  People may also disagree on which verses are easier to interpret (“clearer”) and which are not.  So then, let us be patient with one another, remain teachable, and be willing to acknowledge that we could be wrong.

Secondly, Doctrine Matters

Do a search on all the times the word “doctrine” (teaching, and proper interpretation) is used in the Bible (please do this and read the verses).  You’ll soon find that the Bible writers considered a right doctrine an extremely important thing.  Indeed, how we live, and our Christian practices will flow from the doctrines we hold to.  A right doctrine also brings light on to what is wrong doctrine, or “heresy”.

Exercise Wisdom

While doctrine is very important, but so is loving the brethren.  We must then take special care to put at attitude of love and patience at the forefront of any doctrinal discussions.  We also MUST be careful not to part fellowship over issues that are not dependent on salvation.
I have been literally yelled at because I do not believe in a pre-tribulation rapture event.  I believe disagreement on that issue is not a reason for anyone to get upset with anyone else.  If a person is truly saved, the timing of the rapture should be a secondary issue.
I would like to think that with enough study, and enough debate, we could one day reach a day when everyone agreed, and every was right.  Since it is unlikely that day will come, we must deal in love and patience, and pray for wisdom.

I have seen churches that emphasize love, and shy away from doctrine.  I have also seen churches that are obsessed with doctrine and turn away those that would dare to disagree on even the smallest points.  Please notice that this is not an ‘either-or’ issue, it is ‘both-and’.  In other words, doctrine AND love must be balanced carefully, and one not forsaken for the other.
When to Part Ways and What to do About It

The Bible does indeed encourage separation on certain things.  We are not to accept anything and everything that comes to us in the name of Christ or the Bible.  So where do we draw the line?  When do we call it heresy?

I believe the first line that must be drawn salvation.  The Bible states that there is a way to be saved and have eternal life.  If the Bible says we must repent and believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ (his finished work), then that issue is not in debate.  Thus, if someone comes along and says that Islam also leads to eternal life, that view must be called heresy.  You might know someone who is Muslim, and they might be a nice person, and they should be treated with the respect you should show any other human being; however, their beliefs are NOT to influence ours as Christians.  Groups or denominations that add works to salvation are also to be challenged.

So what about non-salvation issues?  What other lines should be drawn?  This is where Holy Spirit guidance and wisdom is key.  Here I cannot give you a cookie-cutter, one size fits all, solution.  Here, you’ll have to do your homework, put in the time, and make a prayed up decision.

For example, there is an interpretation of some verses put forth by some in the “Word-Faith Movement” that I personally qualify as heretical.  On the other hand, I know some people who hold those views that claim to have put faith in Christ, and I believe they are real Christians.  What do I do?  Do I break off fellowship and contact?  Or stay friends?

Each situation has its’ own context.  Each situation contains its’ own individual, unique qualities.  The Lord may lead me to have patience towards someone with these views, until they come to certain knowledge on their own.  The Lord may also lead me to rebuke someone with these views, because they’re being hardheaded.  Only the Lord knows which one of those things is the right one in each particular situation.

Finally…
The question was asked, “what is heresy?”  I then proceeded to go a bit past that and talk about how it works in real life.  I like to get right to the point of an issue, it’s how my mind works.  I believe heresy is easy to define, and hard work out in real time.  That is why I spent time on that.

Please also remember that you could be wrong, I could be wrong.  How would I want someone to treat me?  I can tell you I’ve been wrong about things.  I might be wrong about my belief on the rapture and not realize it.  Ever heard the phrase, “you don’t know, what you don’t know”?  That is why doctrine, love, and patience must all work together in identifying heresy, and dealing then with it.

QUESTION: Can Christians drink alcohol as long as they don’t get drunk?

SHORT ANSWER: The Bible does not prohibit the use / consumption of alcohol; however, there are many warnings about the losening of morals that can occur if one drinks too much. While intellectual honesty demands this answer, this question should also be met with the examination of ones’ self and his/her motives. WHY do I want to drink alcohol? What is the purpose? What is the goal? Can I praise and thank God for the consumption of this liquid? As with all things, please emerse yourself in fasting and prayer before reaching a conclusion.

Finally, the New Testament not only mentions sin, it also mentions convictions (Romans 14). While it may not be a sin to consume alcohol per se, the Holy Spirit may lead you to not to drink any. And if I may… add to your fasting and prayer a life led by the Spirit! Ephesians 5:18!

LONG ANSWER: As mentioned above, I do not find any prohibition to consume alcohol in the Bible. Why do I say that?

In the Old Testament we see three major types of laws set before us: Moral, Ceremonial, and Judicial (a few may fairly be called “Civil”). The law is our guide on what is called sin, and the breaking of the law is sin. All the ceremonial and judicial requirements of the law have been fulfilled in Christ (Romans 10:4); however, we are still oblidged as Christians and to follow the moral law (Colossians 3:5-6). Keeping this in mind…

While we see prohibitions against homosexuality (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13), fornication (Leviticus 18), adultery (Deuteronomy 22:22)(all violations of the Moral law), and many other such things, we see no similar outlawing of the consumption of alcohol. Therefore, it would be a dishonest interpretation to say it is a sin.

With that said, let us flip this same coin and show the other side. While there is no explicit prohibition in the Bible, the Old and New Testaments do have many warnings against having too much “strong drink”. (Proverbs 20:1; 23:21, Romans 13:13, 1 Corinthians 5:11; 6:1 are some examples)

Now before moving on to the next section, I have to also be honest and say that even drunkenness itself is never explicitly called a sin. The warnings are explicit to what you might do while drunk, and a lifestyle of drunkenness. (Proverbs 20:1)

The simple truth is that when people drink too much, they do things they might not do when sober. There is a loosening of the morals that occurs. People often become loud, rude, violent, etc.

Consider the words of Proverbs 31:4-7, “[4] It is not for kings, O Lemuel, it is not for kings to drink wine; nor for princes strong drink: [5] Lest they drink, and forget the law, and pervert the judgment of any of the afflicted. [6] Give strong drink unto him that is ready to perish, and wine unto those that be of heavy hearts. [7] Let him drink, and forget his poverty, and remember his misery no more.”

Let’s focus on verses 4 and 5 and think about how we, as Christians, can apply this advice to our lives. We Christians have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. We carry the message of the Gospel. We are to obey the Spirit every minute of our lives. (Now, I realize that no one is perfect; however, as I am fond of saying, “there is a difference between a mistake and a lifestyle”.)

If it is not proper for kings to drink for the reasons given in verse 5, how much more reason does the vessel of the Gospel have to NOT RISK to get carried away with strong drink. If earthly business needs such care, then our heavenly business most certainly does as well.

While intellectual honesty and proper interpretation demands that I say drinking alcohol is not a sin, this same honesty leads me to ask another question. How much is too much? When is the line crossed? How will you know? While I can’t tell you it’s a sin, I believe there is sufficient evidence in scripture not to take risks in this matter.

It’s like I tell my kids… you can take drugs, you might die, you might not, but why take the chance?

One of the sad stories I reference to them on this subject is life of Len Bias. I live in North Carolina and ACC basketball around here is big stuff. Bias, played for the Maryland Terrapins. (Maryland was in the ACC at that time) Bias was the second overall pick in the 1986 NBA draft. He would have went on play with the likes of Bird, Parrish, McHale, and Walton. Notice I said, he would have… he died from taking drugs and never played a single game in the NBA. No telling what he might have been able to accomplish.

Let’s apply this same logic to drinking. Maybe you’ll drink too much, maybe you won’t. Maybe you’ll have too much and beat your wife, maybe you won’t. Perhaps you’ll have too much and do or say something that ruins your testimony, may you won’t. BUT WHY TAKE THE CHANCE?

This leads to another thing I teach my kids about life. ONE MOMENT can change your life for the better, or for the worse. ONE MOMENT doing something you’d never otherwise do, could land you in jail. It could run your testimony. People are watching. Is it worth the risk?

“So why tell me it’s not a sin, and then encourage me not to do it?” HONESTY. We must always treat scripture with the utmost care, being careful to interpret it correctly, and not twisting it to try make it say what we want it to say. We should ALWAYS have good reasons and a strong foundation for our beliefs.

Finally, some may tell you that drinking is a sin. Perhaps your Pastor will tell you my response here is wrong. Maybe that’s worth debating and maybe it’s not.

Herein is wisdom, knowing when to debate and when not. Be careful that we treat our brethren with love and respect, even when we disagree. The best advice I can give in all things, is to follow the Spirit.

What did Jesus mean when He promised an abundant life?

SHORT ANSWER: Jesus mentions the “abundant life” in John 10: [10] The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. This abundant life begins the moment a person is born again.

Upon repentance and belief in the Gospel the Spirit of God comes to indwell the new believer. The Spirit of God causes our spirit man to be brought to life. This new life causes a complete change in ones' desires and attitude. The Spirit of God also brings into our lives the “fruit of the Spirit” that empowers us live a life that would be impossible in our own effort.

The new believer is now in God’s hands, and God promised to take care of our needs. In light of this promise Jesus calls us to a worry-free life. Therefore, I believe the abundant life is defined as, a life of total dependence on God that frees us from the stress of taking care of ourselves and allows us to serve him in a way that is not possible in our own power.

LONG ANSWER: Focusing on the definition provided above in the ‘short answer’, let’s talk about submission and service.

FOCUS
Recently, we were discussing at a Bible Study how folks can serve better. One person stated that serving helps us focus on God, and takes our focus off ourselves. I thought to myself that this really hits at the heart of what it is to have an abundant life in Christ. If indeed, my life is not to be about me, then it must be about others (Romans 15:1, Philippians 2:3, etc).

Therefore, my life must needs be centered around serving. But how can I serve if I am bogged down in anxiety and worry? How can I serve if the only person I want to please is myself? Am I chasing submission to God, or getting more stuff?

See how this ties together? If I submit to God, and God takes care of me, then that frees me from ANY hindrance that would keep me from helping others. This indeed then allows his blessings to flow through me to others. This also leads into salvation and discipleship. As I help others, and others come to Christ, our example of this life then helps those also live this life and pass it on to others.

THE REAL ENEMY
Luke 12 [15] And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth.

Matthew 24 [24] Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.

So what’s stopping me? ME! Scripture is very clear on who our biggest enemy is, that is, ourselves. No demon can stop you. If God is on our side, then who can stop us (Romans 8:37-39, 1 John 4:4, 5:4) ? So again, what is stopping me? There just isn’t any good excuse for being selfish, and not living the abundant life.

THE DIVIDING LINE
Now this subject is not without some controversy. Is this abundance in earthly riches only? Or in spiritual things alone? I believe the answer is not an either-or, but in fact a both-and. I believe the abundant life is rooted in the Spirit, and therefore in spiritual things first and foremost; however, this also produces fruit in the physical realm. An obedient life will lead to Gods blessing on our lives. This therefore will also involve physical blessings.

My concern is when the physical blessings become the focus. This again, puts the focus on self, and not being a servant. Focus on ‘naming and claiming’, ‘your best life now’, and such things have NOTHING to do with service, and a lot to do with pleasing self and the flesh. So where’s the divide? It lies within the focus. Am I focused on serving? Or using God-talk (attempting to manipulate God) to get what I want? Am I serving to please him? Or somehow get something out of this for myself? What is it that I am expecting in return?

FULL CONTEXT
Returning to John 10:10... full context is John 10:1-14. Please read it and meditate on it. Think upon all the things that lead up to his statement in verse 10.

Notice several things that lead to Jesus’ statement on the abundant life. Jesus is the only way we are to follow, and the only way to be saved. He is the only source we are to rely on (not worldly riches, gain, or world wisdom or psychology). Those that are truly His, will not follow a false shepherds. He gives His life for us, and the enemy seeks to take our lives from us. All these thoughts lead up to Jesus’ statement, “I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly”.

Jesus is our life. He lived life the way it was meant to be lived. Jesus was a servant. Therefore the abundant life lies in submission to God and serving others. Notice this is just the opposite of what the world considers ‘abundant life’.

FINAL THOUGHT While writing this response, I felt very convicted myself. I now see even more areas I need to work on. I hope reading this has done the same for you. I really have no excuse for being anything less than God wants me to be; but it really is up to me.

God promised to supply, help, lead… but I have to ask, I have to want to. I have to make a willful decision to obey. Abundant life is waiting; however, God is not negotiating terms of our obedience or service. We are to submit wholly, and live holy, and then… and only then… we can experience this life.

John 6:44, Total Depravity and Irresistible Grace

I have heard many Calvinists say that John 6:44 is proof of irresistible grace because “those that are drawn are the ones who are raised”. From this verse is also included the Calvinist’ own view of total depravity (which equals “inability”).

I will agree that one has to be drawn, that much is plain; however, it is not as plain to me the conclusion that the Calvinists come to with this verse.

Let’s quickly review the verse:

John 6:44
No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

It is agreed that no one can come unless the Father draws that person unto Christ (via the Holy Spirit). It is also agreed that apart from the sharing of the Gospel no one would ever turn to God. In other words, apart from one hearing the Gospel it is impossible for them to be saved (thus the importance of obeying the call to preach the Gospel to every creature). No one apart from the Gospel just up and decides one day that, “hey, I think I’ll serve God”. However, this and John 6:44 do not exclude the possibility that one has a real choice at the moment of the Holy Spirit’s drawing. And this is the thrust of my argument… that at the moment of the Holy Spirit’s drawing man has a real choice to decide whether or not he will rebel or repent and believe the Gospel.

I do not interpret this verse as saying, “the ones that are drawn are the ones that are raised” or “being drawn equals being raised”. I believe that the proper interpretation of this verse is that, “the one that is raised is the one that comes… and that one can only come if he is drawn”. My question to the Calvinist is; how am I misinterpreting this verse? Is there some grammatical reason in the Greek that I should not come to this conclusion? It is my opinion that if one does not come to this verse with a preconceived idea of what it has to mean (in light of a certain set of presuppositions such as TULIP), I believe that one would come to the same conclusion I have reached. Of course I reserve the right to be wrong, so if anyone can show me OBJECTIVELY from reason and context how I am misinterpreting this verse I will concede the point.

Working with the interpretation that, “the one that is raised is the one that comes… and that one can only come if he is drawn”… we can see that the verse does not exclude the possibility (logically) that one could, at the moment he is drawn, refuse repentance (thus refuting, if I am right, the Calvinist’ view of Irresistible Grace and that Total Depravity equals total inability). Now at this point some have sought to misrepresent this view as a sort of “deal” that God makes with man. For example, one straw man in this line of thinking said that our view is like someone buying a car. God offers a price, a “good deal” if you will, and the man then decides whether or not the price is right. This analogy is flawed and if you’re going to bring me to your side you’ve got to deal with what I believe.

At the moment a person is convicted of sin, a bargaining table is hardly the scene that represents the situation. When a person is being drawn he is being shown that he is a sinner in need of Jesus’ sacrifice. He is dealing with the Holiness of God, the penalty of sin, the weakness of himself, et al. This is a serious issue and at that moment the person is hardly “cutting a deal”. He is being presented with the truth of all truths, believe and repent or refuse and rebel. An atmosphere of the conviction of sin is the picture here, hardly two making a “deal”.